
Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) is a material-extrusion 3D printing process . It works by feeding a thermoplastic filament into a heated nozzle, where it melts and is deposited layer by layer along a programmed toolpath to build the part. In essence, an FDM printer works much like a computer-controlled hot glue gun, extruding thin beads of molten plastic that quickly solidify to form a three-dimensional object.
FDM is the most widely used 3D printing method, particularly at the consumer and educational level. With the largest installed base of printers worldwide, it is often the first process people think of when talking about 3D printing. You may also see the term Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) used interchangeably. Because “FDM” is a trademark owned by Stratasys, the open-source 3D printing community adopted “FFF” as a neutral alternative; in practice, both terms describe the same extrusion-based process.
This article explains the basics of FDM, including its pros and cons and the differences between desktop and industrial machines. It also covers the common printing plastics and the situations where FDM is most suitable.
While FDM is now the most popular 3D printing method, it was not the first to be invented. In fact, it came after both stereolithography (SLA) and selective laser sintering (SLS). Scott Crump filed the first FDM patent in 1989—three years after SLA and one year after SLS—and together with his wife Lisa founded Stratasys to bring the technology to market.
Throughout the 1990s, Stratasys held the key patents and positioned FDM primarily for industrial prototyping. A major shift came in 2005 with the RepRap (Replicating Rapid Prototyper) Project, an open-source initiative by Adrian Bowyer that aimed to create self-replicating printers. When the core FDM patents expired in 2009, this movement paved the way for companies such as MakerBot, Ultimaker, and Prusa Research to emerge, making desktop printers affordable for hobbyists and educators.
By the 2010s, industrial systems from Stratasys and consumer printers from companies inspired by the open-source movement together had firmly established FDM as the world’s most widely used 3D printing technology.

Today, this evolution has resulted in two main categories of machines: industrial systems for professional production and desktop printers for consumers and educators. Their key differences are summarized below:
| Property | Industrial FDM | Desktop FDM |
| Standard accuracy | Around ±0.2–0.3 mm | Around ±0.2–0.5 mm |
| Typical layer thickness | 0.15–0.3 mm | 0.1–0.25 mm |
| Minimum wall thickness | ~1 mm | ~0.8–1 mm |
| Maximum build volume | Large (e.g., 900 × 600 × 900 mm) | Medium (e.g., 200 × 200 × 200 mm) |
| Common materials | ABS/ASA, PC, Nylon, ULTEM | PLA, ABS, PETG, TPU |
| Support materials | Breakaway & soluble | Same material or soluble (dual-extruder) |
| Production capability | Low–medium; repeatable batches | Low; prototypes and one-offs |
| Machine cost | $50,000+ | $500–$5,000 |

An FDM printer turns a digital design into a physical object through the following steps:
3D Modeling : The process begins with a digital model, usually created in CAD software or downloaded from a 3D library. The model is exported in a format like STL or OBJ, which defines the object’s geometry.
Slicing: Slicing software converts the 3D model into a stack of two-dimensional layers and generates the toolpaths the printer will follow. It also adds any necessary supports for overhangs and outputs a G-code file containing the print instructions. Key settings,such as layer height, print speed, infill density, and support placement, are chosen at this stage and directly affect print quality and duration.
Printer Setup: The filament spool is loaded into the extruder, which feeds material toward the hot end. The build plate is cleaned and leveled to ensure proper adhesion of the first layer, and for materials like ABS, it is typically preheated to reduce warping.
Heating, Extrusion, and Layer Deposition: When the nozzle reaches the target temperature, the extruder pushes filament into the heated head, where it melts. The extrusion head is mounted on a three-axis motion system (X, Y, Z) that guides the nozzle precisely across the build area. As the head moves, it extrudes thin strands of molten plastic onto the build plate along the predetermined path.
Each new layer is deposited on top of the previous one. The material cools and solidifies quickly; in many cases, cooling fans attached near the extrusion head accelerate this process, especially for materials like PLA. To fill in wider regions, the nozzle makes multiple passes until the layer is complete. Then, either the build platform descends or the extrusion head rises by one layer height, and the machine begins the next layer. This cycle repeats hundreds or thousands of times until the entire part is built.
The material cools and solidifies almost immediately—often aided by fans for faster cooling with materials like PLA. To fill an area, the nozzle makes multiple passes, much like coloring in a shape with a marker. Once a layer is complete, either the build platform lowers or the extrusion head rises by one layer height, and the process repeats. Layer by layer, the part is built up from the bottom until it is fully formed.
Support Structures: For overhangs or bridges, the printer generates support material to keep unsupported sections from collapsing. These supports may be printed in the same plastic and later broken off, or in a secondary dissolvable filament if the printer has multiple nozzles.
Post-Processing: Once the final layer is deposited, the part cools and is removed from the build plate. Most FDM prints require little more than support removal, but additional finishing steps can be applied if a smoother surface or enhanced performance is desired.
Common post-processing methods for FDM parts include:
FDM is generally the most affordable 3D printing method in both machine price and material cost. Desktop units range from just a few hundred to a few thousand dollars, and even many industrial FDM systems remain less expensive than their SLA or SLS counterparts. Filament is inexpensive, widely available in many brands and types, and easy to source. This low barrier to entry makes FDM accessible for classrooms, research labs, and small businesses.
FDM is excellent for fast design iteration. A part can be printed in minutes to a few hours, allowing teams to go from concept to physical prototype overnight. Compared with methods that require long curing or cooling cycles, FDM shortens lead times and accelerates product development.
FDM supports a broad range of thermoplastics, from common and affordable options like PLA, ABS, and PETG to engineering-grade materials such as Nylon, Polycarbonate, and TPU, and even high-performance polymers like ULTEM or PEEK on industrial systems. This versatility allows engineers to choose materials that closely match the performance requirements of the final product.
Unlike resin or powder-based systems, which are restricted by vat or bed dimensions, FDM machines can be scaled simply by enlarging the frame and motion system. This scalability gives FDM a clear cost-to-size advantage and makes it a practical solution for producing large prototypes such as automotive components or architectural models.
Operating an FDM printer is straightforward: load the filament, start the print, and remove the part when it’s done. Post-processing is usually limited to detaching supports, unlike resin printing which requires washing, curing, and handling of chemicals. Many FDM parts are ready to use immediately, with extra finishing only required for certain materials or applications. Another advantage is color flexibility: with filaments available in a wide range of shades, models can often be printed in their final look without the extra painting that resin prints typically require.

FDM allows users to adjust infill density and shell thickness, balancing print time, material consumption, and mechanical performance. This tunability means parts can be optimized as lightweight prototypes or as stronger functional components. On higher-end systems, dissolvable support materials are also available, making it easier to handle complex geometries and simplifying post-processing.
FDM uses filament that is melted and deposited exactly where needed, so almost no raw material is wasted during printing. This contrasts with powder-based methods like SLS or MJF, where unused powder requires handling and may degrade after multiple cycles. With smart design that minimizes or eliminates support structures, FDM can be even more efficient in material usage.
FDM builds objects with visible layer lines, and even at fine settings (~0.1–0.2 mm), curved surfaces show a “stair-stepping” effect. The minimum feature size is limited by nozzle diameter (often ~0.4 mm), so very small details or precision fits are difficult to achieve. As a result, professional-quality appearance or accuracy often requires post-processing: threads may need tapping, holes may need reaming, and surfaces may need sanding, painting, or vapor smoothing for a polished finish. FDM also struggles to produce fully watertight or airtight parts without additional sealing.
Because parts are made layer by layer, FDM prints are anisotropic: significantly weaker along the Z-axis. The bonding between layers is less robust than within a layer, making parts more likely to split or delaminate under stress applied perpendicular to the build direction. This limits their performance in mechanically critical applications unless part orientation and infill are carefully optimized.
Thermal contraction during cooling can cause parts to warp, with edges lifting off the build plate or thin features bending. ABS and Nylon are especially prone to this, often requiring heated beds or enclosed chambers. Even with calibration, achieving high dimensional accuracy is difficult, with tolerances typically around ±0.1–0.3 mm. Holes and fine details often need adjustment or machining for a precise fit.
FDM printers require support structures for overhangs steeper than ~45° or long bridges. These supports add material, extend print times, and can leave blemishes when removed. Complex internal geometries may be impossible to print because supports would be trapped inside. While dual-extruder machines with dissolvable supports improve flexibility, they add cost and still require removal steps.
Although FDM supports many thermoplastics, it is still limited to that class of materials. Metals and full ceramics cannot be printed directly. High-performance polymers like PEEK or ULTEM require very high nozzle and chamber temperatures, making them accessible only on specialized industrial machines. As a result, each FDM printer can only handle a subset of the full material spectrum.
Due to the simplicity and cost-driven design of FDM systems, users often spend time tweaking settings like bed leveling and nozzle height to achieve consistent quality. The heavy reliance on mechanical motion means regular maintenance is needed—adjusting belt tension, lubricating rails, cleaning extruders, and replacing parts such as nozzles or hot ends.
Print quality is highly dependent on filament quality. Poor dimensional tolerance in filament diameter or inconsistent composition can lead to extrusion problems. In addition, most filaments are hygroscopic; if not stored properly, they absorb moisture from the air, leading to bubbling, poor surface finish, or weak layer adhesion during printing.

Decades of development in the plastics industry have created a wide range of polymer filaments, from everyday plastics to specialized engineering polymers.
PLA is the most popular filament for desktop FDM printers. It’s a biodegradable plastic (often corn-starch based) that is easy to print and produces parts with good detail and surface quality. When higher toughness and temperature resistance are needed, ABS is usually the choice. However, ABS is more prone to warping and often requires a heated bed or chamber to keep corners from lifting.
Another popular alternative is PETG, which combines PLA’s ease of printing with ABS’s durability. It offers a good balance of strength, flexibility, and chemical resistance.
Industrial FDM machines, on the other hand, mainly use engineering thermoplastics such as ABS, polycarbonate (PC), and Ultem (PEI). These materials often include additives to enhance their properties, making them suitable for demanding applications that require high impact strength, thermal stability, chemical resistance, or even biocompatibility.
The table below summarizes the key pros, cons, and typical applications of the most common FDM printing materials:
| Material | Pros | Cons | Common Applications |
| PLA | Easy to print; great detail & surface finish. Bio-based and minimal warping. | Brittle; low heat resistance (deforms at ~60 °C). Not ideal for load-bearing parts. | Visual prototypes, models, education, hobby projects |
| ABS | Strong and durable; higher temperature resistance (~100 °C). Can be post-processed (e.g., acetone smoothing). | Prone to warping without heated bed/chamber. Emits fumes (needs ventilation). Slightly harder to print than PLA. | Functional prototypes, enclosures, automotive parts, consumer products |
| PETG | Good strength and layer adhesion; prints easily with low warp. Moisture and chemical resistant; often food-safe. | Slightly less stiff than ABS; surface can attract stringing if settings aren’t tuned. | Functional parts, containers, mechanical components, household items |
| Nylon (PA) | High tensile strength and toughness; wear and chemical resistant. Some flexibility (for hinges) and great durability. | Absorbs moisture (filament must be kept dry). Needs high print temps and enclosure to reduce warping. | Gears, bearings, clips, jigs and fixtures, structural prototypes |
| TPU (Flex) | Very flexible and elastic – can create rubber-like parts. Good impact absorption. | Difficult to print accurately at speed (slow prints needed). Soft filament can jam in some extruders not designed for flexibles. | Gaskets, seals, phone cases, wheels/tires, medical models |
| Polycarbonate (PC) | Excellent impact strength; higher heat resistance (~110 °C). Suitable for tough functional parts. | Requires high printer temps; prone to warping/cracking if cooled too fast. Generally needs an enclosed, industrial-grade printer. | Industrial tooling, protective housings, automotive components |
| PEI/ULTEM | High-performance: great strength-to-weight, flame retardant, works up to ~170 °C. Used in aerospace, automotive. | Very expensive material; only prints on high-end machines due to extreme temperature requirements. | Aerospace parts, under-the-hood automotive components, medical devices |
Given the strengths and limitations discussed, here are some typical cases where FDM is the most suitable choice compared to other methods:
Cost or Speed is the Primary Concern: If you need a prototype quickly and inexpensively, FDM is hard to beat. You can go from CAD to a physical part in the same day without breaking the bank. Perfect for early-stage prototyping, student projects, and hobby builds where affordable iteration matters more than perfection.
The Part Size is Large: Large-format FDM printers can handle parts that would be extremely costly or impossible in resin vats or powder beds. Think architectural models, full-size casings, or big functional prototypes – FDM scales up more easily and at lower cost.
Functional Prototypes in Real Plastics: When you need the prototype to behave like a production plastic part – for example, a clip that must flex without breaking or a mount that must withstand heat – FDM with ABS, PC, or Nylon is ideal. These parts can be drilled, screwed, and tested in working conditions where resin prints might fail.
Custom Tools, Jigs, or Replacement Parts: FDM excels at producing one-off or low-volume parts tailored to specific needs. A custom jig for assembly? A replacement knob for equipment? Print it overnight and put it to work. For many moderate-duty uses, FDM prints can serve as real end-use parts.
Educational and Home Environments: FDM is the most user-friendly and safe 3D printing option in classrooms, makerspaces, and homes. PLA and similar filaments are easy to handle, letting learners focus on design and engineering. The low cost per part also encourages experimentation and iteration.
When Post-Processing Must Be Minimal: If you need a part straight off the printer with little extra work, FDM fits. Just remove supports, and the part is ready to handle. For demos and workshops, this immediacy makes FDM especially practical.
Chiggo offers on-demand FDM 3D printing for both prototypes and production runs. We can deliver high-quality FDM parts in just a few days. Upload your CAD files to receive an instant quote. For more details or to discuss your requirements with our team, contact us today.
延展性是材料科学中的一个基本概念,它解释了为什么某些材料(例如金属)会在压力下显着弯曲或伸展,而另一些材料突然突然会弯曲。在本文中,我们将解释什么是延展性,如何测量,为什么重要以及哪些因素影响它。 延展性的定义 延展性是材料在断裂前张力造成塑性变形的能力。简而言之,可以将延性材料拉长很长的路,而无需捕捉 - 考虑将铜拉入电线中。相比之下,像玻璃这样的脆性材料几乎没有变形后倾向于破裂或破碎。在材料科学中,塑性变形是形状的永久变化。这与弹性变形不同,弹性变形是可以恢复的。延展性与可塑性密切相关,但更具体:可塑性是在任何模式(张力,压缩或剪切)下永久变形的一般能力,而延展性则是指张力的能力。 从原子的角度来看,许多金属的高延展性来自非方向金属粘结以及允许脱位移动的滑移系统的可用性。施加压力后,脱位滑行使金属晶体可容纳塑性应变,因此金属通常弯曲或拉伸而不是断裂。相比之下,陶瓷和玻璃具有定向离子或共价键,并且滑动非常有限,因此在张力下,它们在明显的塑料流动之前倾向于破裂。但是,并非所有金属在室温下都是延性的(例如,某些BCC金属,高碳钢和金属玻璃杯可能相对脆),并且加热玻璃弯曲的玻璃弯曲主要是由于其玻璃转换温度以上的粘性流量,而不是金属式耐耐耐高压。 测量延展性 拉伸测试是量化延展性的最常见方法:标本以单轴张力加载到骨折中,延展性据报道是休息时伸长率的百分比和降低面积的百分比。 休息时伸长百分比(a%) 骨折时量规长度的百分比增加:a%=(lf -l0)/l0×100%,其中l0是原始量规长度,而LF是断裂时的最终长度。较高的A%表示拉伸延展性更大。 减少面积百分比(RA%) 裂缝位置的横截面的百分比降低:RA%=(A0 - AF)/A0×100%,其中A0是原始面积,AF是休息时的最小面积。大的RA%反映出明显的颈部和强烈的颈后延展性。 (对量规长度不太敏感;对于非常薄的纸张而言并不理想。) 这两种措施通常是拉伸测试的一部分。例如,可以描述钢样品的伸长率20%,而在休息时降低了60%的面积 - 表明延性行为。相比之下,脆性陶瓷可能仅显示1%的伸长率,而本质上可能显示出0%的面积减少(几乎没有变薄)。伸长率和降低越大,材料的延展性就越大。 可视化延展性的另一种方法是在应力 - 应变曲线上,这是从拉伸测试获得的图。绘制应力(相对变形)的应力(每单位面积)。此曲线上的要点包括: 杨的模量(E):线性弹性区域的斜率;刚度的度量。 屈服强度(σᵧ):塑性变形的发作(通常由0.2%偏移方法定义时,当不存在尖锐的屈服点)。 最终的拉伸力量(UTS):最大工程压力。超越标本的脖子;断裂发生后期,通常处于较低的工程压力下。 断裂点:标本最终破裂的地方。 延性材料(蓝色)与脆性材料(红色)的代表性应力应变曲线 延性材料的曲线在屈服后显示长塑料区域,表明它可以在骨折前保持较大的应变。相比之下,脆性材料的曲线在屈服点附近结束,几乎没有塑料区域。总而言之,在工程应力 - 应变图(对于规定的规格长度)上,延展性反映了裂缝的总应变 - 延性材料的长时间,脆性材料的较短。但是,明显的断裂应变取决于所选的量规长,一旦颈部开始定位,颈部开始定位,因此工程曲线不是颈后延展的直接衡量。因此,规格通常在休息时报告百分比伸长率(a%)以及降低面积百分比(RA%)。 延展性和延展性有什么区别? 延展性是一种材料在不破裂而伸展张力的能力。我们以拉伸测试的伸长百分比或减少面积来量化它。如果可以将金属吸入电线,则是延展性的。锻造性是一种材料在压缩方面变形的能力(不开裂,可以锤击,滚动或压入纸板);我们通过弯曲/扁平/拔罐测试或减小厚度可以耐受多少判断。 实际上:黄金,铜和铝都是高度延展且可延展的(非常适合电线和纸板)。铅非常具有延展性,但仅适中延展性(易于滚动成薄片,较差,作为细丝)。镁在室温下的延展性有限,而锌在变暖时会更具延展性。为了制造制造,选择延性合金用于绘画,深度拉伸和下拉的功能;选择可延展的合金滚动,冲压和锻造,在压缩占主导地位的地方。温度和晶体结构移动两个特性。快速规则:延展性=张力/电线;锻造性=压缩/表。 为什么延展性很重要 延展性是制造性和服务安全性安全背后的安静主力。在工厂中,它允许将金属卷成纸板,将其拉入电线并锻造而不会破裂。在现场,它使组件能够吸收能量,重新分配应力并在失败前提供警告。 制造的延性材料 高延展性通常意味着一种材料是可行的:它可以锻造,滚动,绘制或挤出成各种形状而不会破裂。低延展性(脆性)意味着该材料很难变形,并且更适合于铸造或加工等过程(在材料不强迫塑料形状过多地改变形状)之类的过程中。 锻造和滚动:这些过程通过锤击(锻造)或在掷骰(滚动)之间将固体金属变形为形状。延性金属耐受涉及的大塑料菌株。实际上,钢板/开花被热卷成薄板,板和结构形状,例如I光束,铝很容易被伪造成组件 - 金属在压缩载荷下流动。相比之下,像铸铁这样的脆性合金倾向于在沉重的变形下破裂,因此通常通过铸造到近网状形式来形状。 挤出和电线/栏绘图:挤出将金属推动通过模具制作长而恒定的截面产品。电线/条形图将固体库存通过模具降低直径。两者都依靠塑料流。可以将延性合金(例如铝,铜和低碳钢)挤出到试管和轮廓(例如窗框,热水链截面)中,并将其抽入细线。在加工温度下没有足够的延展性的材料倾向于检查或裂缝,这就是为什么玻璃或陶瓷不会以固态挤出/绘制的原因;他们的纤维是融化的。 深图:深色绘图形成轴对称的杯子和罐,并用拳头迫使薄板进入模具;法兰向内进食,而墙壁略微稀薄。足够的延性可防止分裂和皱纹。铝饮料罐头是经典的例子。 薄板金属弯曲和冲压:车身面板和外壳的一般弯曲和冲压需要延展性,以避免边缘裂纹和橙色 - 薄荷伸展时。钢制和铝等级是针对形成性量身定制的,因此可以将复杂的形状(例如,汽车引擎盖)盖章而不会故障。 金属3D打印(AM):延展性仍然很重要。当然的零件(尤其是来自激光粉床融合(LPBF))可以显示出由于细,质感的微观结构,残留应力和孔隙率而显示出降低的延展性。压力缓解和热等静止压力(髋关节),然后经常进行轻热处理,恢复延展性并降低开裂风险;然后,TI-6AL-4V和ALSI10MG等合金可以提供有用的服务延展性。 现实世界应用的延性材料 延展性不仅是实验室指标,还直接影响现实世界结构,车辆和设备的性能。这就是为什么它在工程和设计中重要的原因: 防止突然失败并提高安全性:延性材料逐渐失效:它们在断裂前产生和吸收能量,提供可见的警告并允许负载重新分配。在建筑物中,这就是为什么结构钢受到青睐的原因 - 超负荷的梁会弯曲而不是捕捉。钢筋混凝土遵循相同的逻辑:嵌入式钢钢筋增加延展性,因此成员可以在地震需求下弯曲而不是分开。 影响(地震和碰撞应用)中的能量吸收:在动态载荷下,延展性将影响能量变成塑料工作。钢框通过屈服来消散地震力,并以钢或铝折叠的汽车碎区域的控制方式以受控的方式降低机舱减速。现代人体结构平衡强度与延展性(例如DP/Trip Steels),并且航空航天Al/Ti合金保留足够的延展性,以造鸟,加压和冷soak耐受性。 […]
在力学中,“螺纹”一词专指“螺纹”,是连接器、紧固件和传动元件不可或缺的重要部件。螺纹广泛应用于各种设备和结构中,如螺栓、螺母、螺杆、丝杠等,都是依靠螺纹来实现其功能的。无论是在生产制造还是日常生活中,螺纹的使用都是无处不在的。没有它们,大多数机器将无法正常运行。
终极拉伸强度(UTS)是材料破裂前可以承受的最大应力的度量。通常通过进行拉伸测试并记录工程应力与应变曲线的情况。作为一项密集的特性,UTS对于比较张力下的材料的性能至关重要。它可以帮助工程师为必须抵抗拉伸负荷而不会失败的结构和组件选择合适的材料。
عربي
عربي中国大陆
简体中文United Kingdom
EnglishFrance
FrançaisDeutschland
Deutschनहीं
नहीं日本
日本語Português
PortuguêsEspaña
Español